🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension caused by the introduction of a new 28-point plan for ending the war appeared – briefly – to have been stabilised. A Washington representative spoke of "significant advancement" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its retaliation: another massive barrage of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Negotiation and Warfare

The sequence of conflicting incidents captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, political struggles are conducted: hopeful statements are issued from multiple capitals. Considerable effort is allocated on restraining specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin clearly shows the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "peace".

After-Dark Attacks

As Russia's attack developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's vulnerability was laid bare. Ukraine is equipped to monitor missile launches from Russian territory, a capability provided through timely intelligence. From witness perspectives, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to counter approaching aerial threats flew past – modern combat jets supplied to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's missile defense thundered: multiple launches deployed against a incoming threat. This was a modern interception technology at work, probably supplied through Western nations. Every launch jolts you unexpectedly, shaking the windows. The moment of terror quickly becomes sober acceptance: perhaps the hostile projectile won't cause damage this time, protecting urban areas from devastation and additional electricity failures.

Ongoing Risks

Not long after, a automatic firearm opened up on a unmanned aircraft in the vicinity, part of a rapid response unit – almost certainly imported technology. Regrettably, the shots failed to hit the enemy aircraft – it maintained course toward its target.

With pauses, this continued until dawn. Kyiv faced the daybreak reports: multiple fatalities, destruction and infrastructure problems in multiple buildings as a result of the night's assault. As typically, everyone still went about their day – enduring hostilities. But those full day encapsulated Ukraine's essential dependence on external assistance – a reliance that neighboring countries are demonstrably unable to fill in the near term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The 28-point plan from Washington sparked intense emotion, discussion and profound anxiety – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after earlier high-level meetings and international summits.

Every new approach from Washington adheres to the consistent cycle: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, manages to fend off. They stabilise the situation but never actually win the battle. This cycle will, undoubtedly, continue.

Strategic Calculations

It is easy to blame certain parties of repeatedly advocating Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration works based on a principle understood by experienced diplomats: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have failed to defend militarily. The American government presumes that it is impossible to compel Moscow to surrender the areas that it already controls in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The problem is that while acknowledging this situation, US leadership does minimal to discourage Russia, through words or deeds, from assuming that the situation will not change more in its favour in the near future.

Divergent Views

Therefore, the Kremlin is convinced that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are coming close to fatigue. Their motivation to agree to terms that does not give them the maximum possible gain is virtually nonexistent. There may be many attempts to end hostilities, but they will persist as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still hold out, slowly losing lives and land but averting a entire defensive failure until circumstances change in its benefit.

Existing Situation

Factually, there are no genuine requirements for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are entering the equation: personal goals to broker a ceasefire and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Ukrainian leadership's twin challenges – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the national cause against any proposal Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their attention does not move to domestic problems. And although their mission will now be much harder after current events, it remains highly unlikely that this will change their overall approach.

These opposing factors are influencing discussions.

Assessment and Future

It took a mere seven days to eliminate the 28 points of the current initiative. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by American leadership, pushback by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of diplomats, and finally, recent disclosures, all achieved their purpose.

While new plans based on established approaches are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off political attacks from Washington that are based on Russian demands and demonstrate particular unwillingness to change the course of events, if they stand together and improve their protective measures at a much faster pace. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the foreseeable future, mainly require continued Western support.